tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jun 02 22:45:32 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: Q on {-meH} (was: long weekend with MO)
- From: Qov <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC: Q on {-meH} (was: long weekend with MO)
- Date: Tue, 02 Jun 1998 22:41:53 -0700
At 22:28 98-06-02 -0700, you wrote:
}In a message dated 98-06-02 13:27:11 EDT, several write:
}
}<< {SammeH bIQatlh.} You're hard to find.
} > {belmoHmeH jIngeD.} I'm easy to please.
} > >>
}
}qulDaq jISup je jIH
}{Qatlh DaSamlu'meH} {ngeD vIbelmoHlu'meH} je vIchup
}qoj {Qatlh DuSammeH wanI'} {ngeD mubelmoHmeH Qu'} je vIghaq
The second pair have already been contributed. The first pair violate the
rule that a {-meH} clause must precede the verb or noun it modifies.
Qov [email protected]
Now on ICQ: 12235599