tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jul 14 20:44:34 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC - DaH mughqa' tuv'el 'e' nIDlaw'
- From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC - DaH mughqa' tuv'el 'e' nIDlaw'
- Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 16:10:43 -0400
From: William H. Martin <[email protected]>
>On Tue, 14 Jul 1998 00:09:26 -0700 (PDT) Alan Anderson
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> juplI' tISujQo' yIyep. 'ej yImeQ'eghchu'Qo'.
>
>Is it just me, or does this look strange? I'd have expected:
>
>juplI'pu' DanuQbe'meH yIyep 'ej yIQop'eghmoHQo'.
>
>I can understand the subjective differences in word choice, and
>I'm sure there's a part of KGT that shows commands stacked like
>this without conjunctions. Still, there seems to be a link here
>between {Suj} and {yep} that is better served with {SujQo'}
>being the purpose of {yep}.
Nah, there's no need for all of that. He just should have added a little
extra punctuation to make it clear.
juplI' tISujQo', yIyep.
SuStel
Stardate 98534.8