tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Aug 25 03:12:30 1998

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: mI'tej qID



qIDlIj vItIvqu'.

On Sun, 23 Aug 1998 07:26:45 -0700 (PDT) "Andeen, Eric" 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Hatlh beQDaq lenglI'meH cha' mI'tejpu', lupwI' lulIgh. chol Sargh tlhab
> ghom'a' Qorwaghvo' 'e' lulegh raQpo'pu'. 
> 
> <mamejnIS 'ej nujuS Sargh ghom'a' 'e' wIloSnIS> maq lupwI' DeghwI'. 
> 
> Qobbe'ba'mo' ghu', Sarghmey bejtaH raQpo'pu'. law'qu'mo' Dojqu'. 
> 
> bejtaHvIS mI'tejpu', Sarghmey buSbe' 'ej ja'chuq. 
> 
> juSpu'DI' Sargh ghom'a' 'ej vIHqa'pu'DI' lupwI', jupDaj ja' mI'tej wa'
> <wa'SaD vaghvatlh wejmaH cha' Sargh lutu'lu'>. 
> 
> jang latlh <bIqIDba'! Sarghmey DatoghlaHbe' jay'!>. 
> 
> jang mI'tej wa' <yIDoghQo'. Sarghmey vItoghbe'ba'. lemDu' vItogh, 'ej
> cha'logh bID vISIm.>
> 
> pagh
> 
> p.s. If anyone has a better way of saying "divide by four", please
> suggest it. I also considered <... loSlogh vIwav.>. If Okrand ever tells
> us about Klingon mathematics, I suspect this is how division will work,
> but without canon behind it, it's weird enough that I cannot use it.

Hmm.
loSlogh mI'vam vIwavchu'. (but that could be dividing by 16)

Perhaps better possibilities:

mI'vam vIwavmeH loS vIlo'. 
mI'vam wav loS.
chenmeH loS ghom nIb, mI'vam vIwav.
chenmeH loS mI' nIb, mI'vam vIwav.

charghwI'




Back to archive top level