tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Aug 10 22:08:14 1998

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: qoSwIj wa'maH HutDIch

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: KLBC: qoSwIj wa'maH HutDIch
• Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 01:07:37 EDT

In a message dated 98-07-25 14:39:26 EDT, Matthew Pepperel writes:

<< wa'Hu qaS qoSwIj wa'maH HutDIch.  DaHram 'oH wIlop.  muiSuch juppu'wI' 'e' 
 vItlhobta'.  DIvutta' 'e' nay'mey DISop. Do' wa'leS jI'uHbe' >>

qoSlIj yItIv
qoSlIj yItIv
qoSlIj yItIv Matthewoy
qoSlIj yItIv

instead of {DaHram 'oH wIlop} I suggest {DaHjaj ram wIlop}.  I do not find
{'oH} as "it" to be necessary at all.  I definitely prefer {DaHjaj ram} over
{DaHram}.

in {muSuch juppu'wI' 'e' vItlhobta'} we find a type seven suffix on the verb
of the {'e'} clause; this is not allowed.  Merely drop the {-ta'}.

For {DIvutta' 'e' nay'mey DISop} I can only guess you mean {nay'mey
DIvutta'bogh DISop}.

And, for {Do' wa'leS jI'uHbe'} I'd try {jIDo'chugh wa'leS jI'uHbe'}.

Just trying to help.   peHruS

• Prev by Date: Re: Alternative approach to learning klingon
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC - Adverbials
• Prev by thread: RE: Alternative approach to learning klingon
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC: qoSwIj wa'maH HutDIch
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level