tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Aug 09 17:31:59 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: In Which Qov and SuStel beat the last drops of blood out of the grammar
- From: "Qermaq" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: In Which Qov and SuStel beat the last drops of blood out of the grammar
- Date: Sun, 9 Aug 1998 20:34:42 -0400
ghItlh cha' SuvwI':
>> >I thought about that, but I decided I would gripe about /SoHvaD
>> >jIQoch/, too, so it was irrelevant here.
>>
>> I'd considered that. But it actually does work.
>>
>> jIQoch.
>> I disagree.
>>
>> SoHvaD jIQoch.
>> I disagree. You are the person to whom this action is directed. I
>> disagree, and you are the receiver of that disagreement.
>I guess then I'd gripe and you wouldn't. That would be a change from
>the usual order of events. :) bIyepqu'mo', SuStel, machep.
Now that you two understand each other... How do you disagree? I mean you,
yourself. You must disagree with something, such as me, right? OR do WE
disagree?
<maQoch> - We disagree. That's what seems most natural. To me. Like <manIb>
vs *<SoHvaD jInIb>. Thoughts?
Qermaq