tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Sep 24 07:16:51 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: "monotonous"
- From: Marian Schwartz <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: "monotonous"
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 10:08:25 -0400
mujang Qov
>I would not read this as "monotonous."
>
>{pe'vIl} means "forcefully" or "by force."
>{rap} means "be the same."
>
>With no context at all I would translate this as either "they were
>forced to be alike" or maybe "they were similar in a way that forced
>itself on you, they were strikingly similar"
Well... Never mind, I apologise. reH po'qu'law' vay' jabbI'IDghomvaD
vIlI'pa'. vIlI'pu'DI', nuDlu'chu'. jIHvaD lI'. Second opinions are good.
Qapla'
qoror