tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Sep 17 13:21:36 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Ha'DIbaHmey
- From: "Marc Paige"<[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Ha'DIbaHmey
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 15:10:00 -0500
ja' ~mark
>>>
>Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 08:01:59 -0700 (PDT)
>From: "Marc Paige"<[email protected]>
>
>ghu'vamvaD Qapbogh buv loS DIp mojaq wIghajchugh maDo'
>mojaqvetlh lutu'lu' 'e' jIpIHlaw'
>chaq matlh tlhob *MO* 'ej mojaqvam chu' tu' 'oH
jImIS. ghu' yIDel. ghu' vIghovbe'.
>It would be nice to have a type 4 noun suffix to handle this situation. It
>seems logical to me that there might be such a suffix. Perhaps MO could
ask
>Maltz about this and discover this new suffix. {{{;-\
For WHAT situation? A little context?
<<<
Reference context:
http://www.kli.org/tlhIngan-Hol/current/0487.html
This is a response/wish to the debate on the proper usage of <'Iv> and
<nuq>
involving *Qov, *SuStel, and *Qermaq.
------------------
SI'IluD
wa'Hu' jIboghbe'