tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Sep 04 20:09:07 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Reform English

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Reform English
• Date: Thu, 4 Sep 1997 22:10:22 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On the conlang mailing list, Guido wrote:
>That was my vudhey. Some nuvs harred I was being klakh qrip or. What would
>*Klinglish* rur? Ghaitan it rur not this huj holkok, mo I nehed not just dud
>the cha hols, atch chak it would be kak to use terangan pab with tlingan
>mus, edge we should hoh every mohak, all to moh it more nap.

Bockrah, I totally yadge this takh dopp.  I sove I niss rootch not, atch I
seem rodded.  Toggers, don't nid this at jooh!

DaH jISaghchoH 'ej Holna' vIlo'choH.
ba'Qa', Dapvam taQ vIyajchu'.
jIruchbe'nIS 'e' vISov, 'ach vIraDlu'law'.
taghwI'pu':  juHDaq yInIDQo'!

-- ghunchu'wI'

• References:
  • Re: Reform English
    • From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC: HeghvaD nol bom'a' (Requiem)
• Next by Date: Re: 2 more Okrandian backfits
• Prev by thread: Re: Reform English
• Next by thread: Adjectival verbs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level