tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Nov 02 18:26:04 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: verb suffix on noun ?

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: KLBC: verb suffix on noun ?
• Date: Sun, 2 Nov 1997 21:28:14 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

ja' Qov:
>...'ay' wej vI' wej vI' vagh 'ay loS vI' cha' vI' Hut (chellu'wI') je...
>...section 3.3.5 and section 4.2.9 (addendum)...

lo'vamvaD <vI'> vIpar.  <DoD> vImaS.  chaq qarchu'be', 'ach Qaplaw'.

{vI'} is specifically "decimal point".  The dot in "3.3.5" is merely a
separator; I think {DoD} is more appropriate here (even if it might be
a colloquialism).

-- ghunchu'wI'

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC: qeqqa' muHwI'
• Next by Date: ngevlu'Qo'wI' (was Re: KLBC: names)
• Prev by thread: Re: KLBC: qeqqa' muHwI'
• Next by thread: RE: KLBC: verb suffix on noun ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level