tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu May 29 11:04:17 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: law'/puS
- From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: law'/puS
- Date: Thu, 29 May 1997 13:01:57 -0500 (CDT)
: >From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
: >
: >Qa' 'ugh law' ghaH 'ugh puS, qar'a'? vaj wImeQbej! vajHa'
: >maqelqa'. [I'm assuming {vajHa'} works for "else". DaparHa''a'?]
:
: Wasn't {*vajHa'} the one example of adverb + -Ha' that Okrand explicitly
: told us that Maltz didn't accept?
:
: ~mark
Yup. Cf. Okrand's article (well, note really) in HolQeD 4.4 on whether -Ha'
may be freely used on adverbials--the complete text of which I posted to the
list a few days ago.
-- Voragh