tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat May 03 16:10:39 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: bIreqtal, was: family suffixes

• From: "SuSvaj" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: bIreqtal, was: family suffixes
• Date: Sat, 3 May 1997 18:04:59 -0400

> SuSvaj commented:
> |HIja'.  bong Heghbe'chugh' be' loDnal, loDnalDaj HoHwI' DoQlaH be'. 
'ach
> |HoHwI' naymeH bIreqtal ta'nIS be'.  tlhogh tay le' 'oH.
> 
> Not quite. The husband's death *cannot* be an accident 

HIja'!  *bong Heghbe'chugh* 'e' vIghItlh.

SuSvaj

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: bIreqtal, was: family suffixes
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: DS9 today
• Next by Date: Re: 'ampaS
• Prev by thread: Re: bIreqtal, was: family suffixes
• Next by thread: Re: bIreqtal, was: family suffixes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level