tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jun 27 20:18:49 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC story: puyjaq
On Wed, 25 Jun 1997, Qov wrote:
| [...] Qu' parHa'qu' ghaH. Sey'.
and
| Sey'qu' chIjwI'.
<'> yIteq -- <Sey> DaghItlhnIS.
| <ghayan SepvamDaq tlhIlmey potlh lutu'lu'.
ghaytan -- Hutlhba' <t>.
^
|qaStaHvIS Hogh law' yuQmey chu' nuD chIjwI' HoD je. yuQ wejDIchDaq
|SaH cha'puj toplIn je. yuQ vaghDIchDaq tayqeq Hachqu' tu'lu' 'ej
| [...] yuQ wa'maH vaghDaq baSmey qubqu' lutu'lu'.
wa'maH vaghDIchDaq -- You used <-DIch> on the other two.
^^^^
| [...] <wIquvlu'moHbej. pop wIHev! mamIp!>
How about <mamIpchoH!> here? Or would that be too Ferengi?
|qal ra'ghomquv 'e' Sov. ghaytan Hegh Daqvam luSovbogh nuv'e'.
^^^^ ^^
<-bogh> clauses have always confused me. Shouldn't this be:
ghaytan Daqvam luSovbogh nuv'e' Hegh.
<ra'ghomquv> is still the subject, no? And you're using <nuv> as an
unsuffixed plural here, "the people who know of this place"?
|
| - lutmey qon 'e' tIvbogh Qov'e'
'ej lutmey chu' DaqontaH 'e' vItIvqu' jIH!
I do hope you're giving serious thought to submitting some of your
stories to _jatlhmey_ No. 3. This one and <HIchDal> would be ideal.
-- Voragh