tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jun 25 14:56:40 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: S26
>Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 01:38:07 -0700 (PDT)
>From: [email protected]
>
>In a message dated 97-06-21 02:27:08 EDT, qoror writes:
>
><< Ah, I forgot that. (By the way, {'e'} actually -could- have {-'e'} on it.
> {-'e'} is an exception to the other Type 5 suffixes because when it's on, it
> doesn't have to indicate something other than the subject or object.
> {'e''e'}
> could be used for something such as "I know -that-.")
> >>
>
>I tend to disagree that {'e'} could take any Noun suffixes. It is not a
>Noun. It is a Pronoun.
Well, pronouns can also take type-5 suffixes. We've seen jIHvaD, etc.
However, I agree with you: I don't like seeing -=>*ANY*<=- noun-suffixes on
the pronoun 'e'. {*'e''e'} is just icky to me.
~mark