tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jun 17 06:46:35 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: compound words

• From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: KLBC: compound words
• Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 08:43:44 -0500

At 11:59 PM 6/16/97 -0700, peHruS wrote:
>In a message dated 97-06-15 09:35:23 EDT, HdW writes:
>
>[pe'...]

>Finally, this is a battle I have entered.  I will not be disappointed if you
>all follow the majority hypotheses.  rInDI' may'vam, che'jaj charghwI'pu'
>

bIDalqu'choH jay'.  cha' meqmo' bISuv 'e' yImev.  wa': bImujchu'. cha':
jabbI'Id QonoSvamDaq pagh mu'mey chu' wI'ogh 'e' wIlaj.  vaj may'lIj
buSlu'taHvIS, SaH pagh.   

ILG-Daq bImuvnIs, qar'a'.  pa' mu'mey chu' law' 'oghtaH.

SKI: I for one am sick of this thread.  Stop beating a dead horse.  If you want
to coin new words, join the ILG.


>peHruS
>
>

-- ter'eS

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: KLBC: compound words
    • From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Klingon Dictionary File
• Next by Date: RE: KLBC: imperatives
• Prev by thread: Re: KLBC: compound words
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC: compound words
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level