tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jun 16 23:59:12 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: compound words
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: KLBC: compound words
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 02:58:41 -0400 (EDT)
In a message dated 97-06-15 11:58:58 EDT, SuStel writes:
<< (I also think that {ja'chuq} is just {ja'} + {-chuq}, and that it never
takes
an object. The way it's used, though, makes it indistinguishable from a
separate verb, and so trying to distinguish them is almost a moot point. >>
While I, too, use {ja'chuq} without any Object as if it were a Verb plus a
Type 1 suffix, I am interested in your line of reasoning while claiming
{HoSghaj} as a standalone Verb and not making the same claim regarding
{ja'chuq}.
peHruS