tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jun 03 23:58:01 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: jatlhwI' pegh
[email protected] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 97-06-03 15:21:44 EDT, ghunchu'wI' writes:
>
> << The example on page 49 even shows that a rover can follow a rover:
> {pIHoHvIpbe'qu'}, {pIHoHvIpqu'be'}.
>
> mu'ghomDaq lengwI' tlha'bogh lengwI' rap wIleghbe', 'ach ghu' Daj.
> not nura' mu'ghom: <-qu'> tlha'laHbe' <-qu'>.
> >>
>
> Then, try saying something with two {-be'}s on it!
DuHbe'be'! :)
wIvqu', law'wI'pu'vaD Holtej jIH
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Thaddaeus Vick, Linguist to the Masses | [email protected] |
| | |
| I could be wrong. After all, there's | |
| a first time for everything. | http://www.crl.com/~dvick |
----------------------------------------------------------------------