tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jan 28 20:34:48 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Klingon phonaesthemes (was Re: lom)

• From: gtwright <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Klingon phonaesthemes (was Re: lom)
• Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 23:18:56 -0800
• References: <[email protected]>

thlIngan folks:
	I have a strong feeling that the canon term for Federation standard
"love" is a joke. First, the concept of "Klingons in love" seems  unlike
the Klingon values across Trek. Second:

Love translates as  b a n g.

Bang. Love. Think about that.

	-Greg Wright
	[email protected]

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Klingon phonaesthemes
    • From: [email protected]

• References:
  • Klingon phonaesthemes (was Re: lom)
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: tlhIngan tlhaqmey
• Next by Date: Re: Klingon phonaesthemes
• Prev by thread: Klingon phonaesthemes (was Re: lom)
• Next by thread: Re: Klingon phonaesthemes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level