tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jan 23 13:58:33 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: Another Attempt at Controversy
- From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: Another Attempt at Controversy
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 97 21:56:42 UT
January 23, 1997 4:51 AM EST, jatlh peHruS:
> vagh tup vIjatlh did not get accepted
> How about vagh tup jIjatlh, putting vagh tup as a time stamp?
> Then, we could have vagh tup tlhIngan Hol paq vIlaDpu', correct?
> The time stamps act in the position of adverbs, correct?
Yes, but it's a time-stamp, not a duration-stamp. We have seen that durations
are usually indicated with some construction using {-vIS}, like {qaStaHvIS}.
qaStaHvIS vagh tup paq vIlaDtaH.
--
SuStel
Beginners' Grammarian
Stardate 97064.8