tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jan 12 12:13:50 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: <'e'> lo'

• From: "eric d. zay" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: <'e'> lo'
• Date: Sun, 12 Jan 1997 15:18:16 -0500

> 	'e' neHbe' vavoy.
> 	That wasn't what my father wanted.


This is an interesting example.  That is definitely what Azetbur said,
however, according to TKD, its illegal.  At the bottom of page 66 we read
"When the verb of the second sentence is *neH* , neither 'e', or net is
used.  It seems that we have a conflict of canon here.

SuSvaj

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: <'e'> lo'
    • From: Voragh <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: <'e'> lo'
• Next by Date: Automated Reply from Misha Chaitanya Chitharanjan
• Prev by thread: Re: <'e'> lo'
• Next by thread: Re: <'e'> lo'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level