tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jan 12 10:18:39 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

<'e'> lo'

• From: mayq <[email protected]>
• Subject: <'e'> lo'
• Date: Sun, 12 Jan 1997 13:19:50 -0500

Is it legal to just have a sentence that begins with <'e'>? I thought it was
to signify that the preceding sentence was used as an object, but if there
is no preceding sentence, then why are we using it?

I mean if I said something like:

bommey vI'Ij 'e' vItIv.

And someone responded with (as SuStel might recall that this is similar to
our little conversation):

'e' vItIv je jIH!

Is that legal? I know it works in English, but does it work in Klingon?

-mayq

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: <'e'> lo'
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: nuqneH
• Next by Date: Re: Learning Klingon language
• Prev by thread: RE: Learning Klingon language
• Next by thread: Re: <'e'> lo'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level