tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Feb 19 12:32:26 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: drinking
- From: "eric d. zay" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: drinking
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 15:37:03 -0500
----------
> From: Donald E. Vick <[email protected]>
> To: Multiple recipients of list <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: drinking
> Date: Wednesday, February 19, 1997 3:14 PM
>
> > > >Yesterday I saw bodies all over the place but today warriors drink
> > > >together.
> > > >
> > > >wa'Hu' lommey vIleghpu 'ach DaHjaj tlhutlh SuvwI'tay
> > > >
> > > >I don't know why I tried this sentence, but I ask you if anythings
wrong
> > > >with it?
> >
> > Since *mey* is the correct suffix for *lom*, it does not have the
> > implication of being "scattered all over the place". To indicate this
you
> > could say:
> >
> > wa'Hu' Dat lommey tu'lu', DaHjaj tlhutlhDI' SuvwI'pu', tay'.
> Shouldn't this be <DatDaq>? Dat is a noun, not an adverb.
No. I refer you to p 27 of TKD:
"Unlike other nouns, these three words (naDev, pa', & Dat)
are never followed by the locative suffix"
SuSvaj