tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Dec 26 20:30:13 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: -vaD
- From: WestphalWz <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC: -vaD
- Date: Fri, 26 Dec 1997 23:29:44 EST
- Organization: AOL (http://www.aol.com)
In a message dated 97-12-25 02:01:05 EST, you write:
<< buQlu'mo' Sormey Sormey vI'oSmeH jIjatlh >>
------------------peHruS answers Scott D Randel's suggestion for
"I speak for the trees."
Sormey has to come as the object of buQlu'mo', giving us Sormey buQlu'mo' for
the first clause. Then I suggest: Sormey buQlu'mo' Sormey 'oS SoQwIj
peHruS