tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Dec 26 20:29:06 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: SuSvaj, jIHlut chovwI''a'!!!!
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: SuSvaj, jIHlut chovwI''a'!!!!
- Date: Fri, 26 Dec 1997 23:28:06 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
- Priority: NORMAL
On Thu, 25 Dec 1997 15:04:58 -0800 (PST) SuSvaj
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> DaHjaj tlhIHvaD "An American Werewolf In Paris" vIchov.
>
> "An American Werewolf in London" lut cha'DIch 'oH jIHlutvam'e'. *Paris*Daq
> paw wej ameriqa'ngan loDpu'. *Daredevil*pu' chaHmo', *Eiffel tower*vo'
> *bunji-jump* neH chaH.
Okay, this is not a correction. It is a question. Should this be
{luneH chaH}?. I'm not sure at all. If this use of {neH} is
supposed to be a form of Sentence As Object, then the object is
singular and it probably should be {luneH chaH}. Meanwhile, if
{neH} is evolving towards being a suffix, it would probably be
just {neH chaH} as stated here.
What do others think?
...
> Hoch lut
> vI'angQo'.
>
> jIHlut cha'DIch 'oHmo', vIpar, 'e' vIpIH, 'ach vIleghDI' vImerlu'. tlhaQ,
> 'ej SeymoH lut. qabbe' *effect*mey le'. "American Werewolf in London"
> DaparHa'chugh, vaj ghaytan jIHlutvam DatIv.
>
>
> -----------------------------
> SuSvaj, jIHlut chovwI''a'!!!!
>
bIchovchu'. majQa'. DaH jIHlutvam vIbej vIneHbej.
charghwI', taghwI' pabpo' ru'
Temporary Beginner's Grammarian, December 20-30