tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Dec 09 23:25:26 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: -chuq and Object?
- From: Qov <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC: -chuq and Object?
- Date: Tue, 09 Dec 1997 23:25:19 -0800
At 22:28 97-12-09 -0800, peHruS wrote:
}In a message dated 97-12-08 14:35:50 EST, HovqIj writes:
}
}<<
} In 4.2.1 TKD tells us to use the no-object-prefix when a verb has the suffix
} {-chuq}. But what do I say when a verb requires two objects (here: "each
}other"
} and "the story")?
} Can I just say: lut wIja'chuq ?
} Or maybe I need a relative clause: maja'chuqbogh 'oH lut'e' (The story is,
}what
} we told each other) ?
} Or is it something completely different?
} >>
}
}---------------------------------------peHruS-------------------------
}maja'chuqtaHvIS lut wIja'
This doesn't escape the problem that we do not know that the thing told can
be an object of {ja'}.
Qov [email protected]
Beginners' Grammarian