tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Aug 20 13:47:07 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: adjectives

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: KLBC: adjectives
• Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 16:46:32 -0400 (EDT)

ghItlh charghwI' :

 
> If this cryptic little critique was supposed to be pointing out 
> that the plural suffix is unnecessary, you should not that while 
> unnecessary, it is quite correct to include it anyway, as shown 
> in the TKD 5.2 - Numbers :-)

Please don't take it too serious, I didna wanna upset you or something...

> In fact, I was quoting Marc Okrand from his audio tape, 
> Conversational Klingon. 
> If you had some other point to make, please make it more explicitly.

Okay, more explicitly: 
{vagh} = five 5
{jav}  = six 6

> charghwI'

______________
muHwI'
Stardate 97637.5

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC: 153 jaj - intro
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC: 153 jaj - 1st part
• Prev by thread: Re: KLBC: adjectives
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC: adjectives
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level