tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Aug 04 22:36:34 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: loDvam ghaH 'Iv'e' ?

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: loDvam ghaH 'Iv'e' ?
• Date: Tue, 5 Aug 1997 01:36:02 -0400 (EDT)

In a message dated 97-08-04 14:02:22 EDT, SuSvaj writes:


Original post came from muHwI'

<< There is nothing wrong with his sentence.  In Klingon either "loDvam ghaH
 'Iv'e'" or "'Iv ghaH loDvam'e'" are both grammatical.  But perhapse this
 issue should be tackled by the grammarians.
  >>

While sentences such as "Who is on first and What is on second" are entirely
grammaticaly, they can be confusing.  The original post makes sense to me,
too, but in an illogical way.

peHruS

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: loDvam ghaH 'Iv'e' ?
    • From: SuSvaj <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Location of {-mo'}
• Next by Date: Re: that man
• Prev by thread: Re: loDvam ghaH 'Iv'e' ?
• Next by thread: Re: loDvam ghaH 'Iv'e' ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level