tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Mar 21 05:09:54 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC double object verbs
- From: "Garrett Michael Hayes" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC double object verbs
- Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 08:07:18 -0500
- Organization: Client/Server Labs
- Priority: normal
On 20 Mar 96 at 15:15, William H. Martin wrote:
> According to Garrett Michael Hayes:
> >
> > Very tiny point. Wouldn't this be <yaHDaq jInobta'>
>
> I definitely considered it. I decided that {-pu'} would be a
> better expression of copping an attitude. I did it. It wasn't
> an accomplishment. I just did it. It is done and I don't want
> or need to do it again. bang vInaghta'. jagh vIcharghta'.
> veQ vIqengpu'.
>
> Catch my drift?
>
drift caught.
Garrett Michael Hayes; Client/Server Labs
8601 Dunwoody Place, Suite 332, Atlanta, GA 30350
[email protected], http://www.cslinc.com
770-552-3645 voice, 770-993-4667 fax
(Opinions expressed are my own and may
not be those of Client/Server Labs, LLC)