tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jun 13 06:24:52 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: To greet or not to greet? Revisited
- From: "Tony Harris (802) 241-3535" <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: To greet or not to greet? Revisited
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 1996 09:31:50 -0500 (EST)
- Autoforwarded: false
- Disclose-recipients: prohibited
- Hop-count: 0
- Importance: normal
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- MR-Received: by mta CCVMON.MUAS; Relayed; Thu, 13 Jun 1996 09:31:50 -0500 (EST)
- MR-Received: by mta CCVMON; Relayed; Thu, 13 Jun 1996 09:31:50 -0500 (EST)
- Priority: normal
- Sensitivity: Company-Confidential
- UA-content-id: 11A66A5F2E00
- X400-MTS-identifier: [;1350310913061996/A08033/CCVMON]
sajatlh (or perhaps more correctly: saghItlh)
Sorry to jump in on this discussion, especially since this is my first post, but I seem to
remember seeing somewhere that another greeting that could be used is qajatlh (I'm talking to
you), and perhaps by extrapolation qaghItlh (I'm writing to you) on paper, email, etc.
This seems to make sense as a way for a Klingon to begin a conversation of whatever sort.
It's short, direct, and to the point, but still serves to get the other's attention.
Has anyone else seen this in print?
Qapla'
TH