tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jan 17 14:45:52 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Reival's log
- From: [email protected] (Alan Anderson)
- Subject: Re: Reival's log
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 1996 17:47:13 -0500
Doug "The MAD Klingon" Pandimen writes:
>Sorry, I seem to have come into this in the middle - what is the below
>{edited} document in reference to? Is it that play/story that was discussed
>a few weeks back?
It's obviously in reference to Reival's log -- it says so right there
in the Subject line :-). "That play/story" indeed might have been
Reival's Campaign, posted a week and a half ago -- if you saw it, you
might remember that it concerned itself with General Reival.
While I'm responding to you, Doug, I might as well point out that your
"signature" is both VERY long and VERY irrelevant to this group -- you
might consider trimming it. One of your recent posts consisted of 14
lines of quoted message, 2 (two) lines of comment from you, and 21 lines
of signature, for a grand total of about 5% useful content. I can't
speak for everyone (and I really shouldn't even be complaining about it
in "public"), but I think signatures should be short and unobtrusive.
-- ghunchu'wI' batlh Suvchugh vaj batlh SovchoH vaj