tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Feb 14 13:15:11 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC:fractions & directions
- From: Adam Walker <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC:fractions & directions
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 96 15:14:38 -0600
- Organization: Dallas Baptist University
>
> >N.E.S.W. ie compas directions:
>
> >Where a planet has a magnetic field could we use...
>
> >NORTH peQ chemlurgh
> >SOUTH peq chemlurghDoH
> >EAST nIHpeQ chemlurgh
> >WEST poSpeq chemlurgh
>
> You're compounding a verb (DoH) onto a noun; there's no evidence you can do
> that in general. Besides, last I looked magnetism flowed as much south as
> it did north; the business about one being forward and one backward is
> completely arbitrary; why should Klingons have picked the same way?
>
Why indeed. Here on earth there are cultures which don't accept
north as the "forward direction." Chinese orders things south,
north, west & east. In fact the ideograph for north is a picture of
two people facing back to back with the idea that if one is faceing
south, as he naturally should be, the other looks north!
Qapla'
mu'vaj.
> Your east and west have another problem. In Klingon Noun-noun
> constructions, the *first* noun modifies the *second*, not the other way
> 'round. And that's true, so far as we can tell, in compounds as well. So
> "nIHpeQ chemlurgh" is something like "right-hand magnetism's
> field-direction" As opposed to magnetism that's somehow left-handed.
> Probably put the the nIH and poS at the end, to indicate the magnetism's
> directions right and left sides.
>
> >if there is no magnetic field - borrowed from Larry Niven...
>
> >SPINWARD DIngDaq
> >ANTI-SPINWARD DIngDaqDoH
>
> >using poS & nIH for left and right of spinward ?
>
> Wouldn't trust the magnetic field anyway; the usual definition of
> north/south in astronomy depends on rotation (most planets rotate): the
> rotation is clockwise around the south pole.
>
> Note the same problem with "DoH", and that you're now putting a noun-suffix
> (-Daq) onto a verb (DIng). Sorry, this just doesn't work out for me at
> all. There may be ways you can make grammatical constructions that get the
> meaning across, but I doubt they'll be very neat.
>
> >QUESTION:
> >In the above NORTH & SOUTH feel ok but would you split the magnetic field. ie...
>
> >peQ nIHchemlurgh
>
> Um... magnetism's right-hand-side's field's direction.
>
> >or even...
>
> >peQ chemlurghnIH ?
>
> magnetism's field's direction's right-hand-side... closer.
>
>
> ~mark
>
>
>