tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Dec 24 15:19:54 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: Hello
- From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: Hello
- Date: Tue, 24 Dec 96 22:25:20 UT
December 23, 1996 11:18 PM, jatlh DloraH:
> *barbarians* jupong'a' jay'
Whichever SkyBox card that was (I've GOT to index these on my computer)
suggests that this should be {maHvaD "barbarians" Dapong'a' jay'?}
> batlh Segh maH
{batlh} is a noun or an adverbial. {quv} is a noun or a verb. You wanted
{Segh quv maH} or {maquv}.
> ghob HoS DIghaj
> (I don't think <ghob HoS> was quite right for <strong ethics>. I wasn't sure
> how to express that.)
Seems okay to me. Perhaps it's the "having" that really throwing you. Maybe
you could say {ghob HoS DIpab}.
> *barbarian* jIHbe'
bIlughchu'! chIch tlhInganpu'vaD "barbarians" pongchugh vay', vIHoH!
--
SuStel
Beginners' Grammarian
Stardate 96982.7