tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Dec 19 01:03:04 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: latlh latlhmey joq
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: latlh latlhmey joq
- Date: Thu, 19 Dec 1996 04:02:32 -0500
In a message dated 96-12-18 11:08:48 EST, you write:
<< >ghItlh ghunchu'wI
> I don't like trying to use {latlh} to say "another [something]".
> That would make it act like an adjectival verb, and it probably
> would have to follow the noun.
I might be reaching a little here, but does this mean that *tlhInganpu'
latlh* or *tlhInganpu' latlhpu' * would be acceptable for "Other Klingons?"
SuSvaj
>>
Again I do not have the old posts handy to refer to. But, I do remember
discussion for quite some time that {Hoch} {pagh} and {latlh} act as numbers
do. Thus, they preceed the noun. In that they are nouns themselves, I agree
with possibly pluralizing them. Furthermore, we have {HochHom} as perhaps
"some."
peHruS
naDev tlhIngan Hol ghojghom wItaghta' loSlogh wIghomchuqpu'
mataghDI' mu'mey Doq SuD chIS qIj tIn mach paq quS nav Doch je DIqeqta'
maghomqa'DI' DIp mojaqmey -vam -vetlh je DIchelta'
vaj wot mojaq -be' wIchelta'
vaj wot mojaq -'a' wItamta'
vaj DIp mojaqmey -vam -velth jevaD DIp mojaqmey -wIj -lIj -Daj -maj -raj
-chaj DItamta'
vaj bIHvaD -wI' -lI' -ma' -ra' je DItamta'
mu'mey loD be' pu' ghot je DIchelta'
vaj marInpa' DIp mojaqmey -mey 'pu' je DIlo'ta'
Sachjaj tlhIngan wo' tlhIngan Hol je