tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Dec 18 15:31:08 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

KBLC: <-taH> and <-ghach> (was Re: typo indeed!)

• From: "Andrew 'Ska' Netherton" <[email protected]>
• Subject: KBLC: <-taH> and <-ghach> (was Re: typo indeed!)
• Date: Wed, 18 Dec 1996 18:32:52 -0500 (EST)
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

> I'd meant to say tlhIjtaHghachmey
>   tlhIj + taH + ghach + mey

	Ah, this makes *much* more sense... "many apologies", as it were.
However, that brings up another point.  Why bother using <-taH> at all if
you're going to normalize the verb?  Does it really add anything to it?  I
would have left it at <tlhIjghachmey>.  Comments, BGs?

  _______________________________________
 / _ \                                   \         ** Andrew Netherton **
 \__)|        "VENI, VIDI VINNIE"         \ __     jo'Sqa, tlhIngan SuvwI' 
     \      I came, I saw my cousin.      |(_ \   Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
      \___________________________________\___/        (519) 885-2717

• References:
  • typo indeed!
    • From: Joel Peter Anderson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: KLBC: too many verbs!
• Next by Date: valid Klingon (was something about <parmaq>)
• Prev by thread: typo indeed!
• Next by thread: RE: typo indeed!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level