tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Dec 16 19:06:20 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: jItlhob Hoch
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: jItlhob Hoch
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 1996 22:07:18 -0500 ()
- Priority: NORMAL
On Sun, 15 Dec 1996 22:34:12 -0800 "eric d. zay"
<[email protected]> wrote:
...
> > The -rQ- or -rq- combination is not legitimate, is it?
> > I would guess Sark to transliterate as {SarIq}
or {Sargh}
> > jej
charghwI'