tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Aug 16 09:59:34 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
lu' vs. tu': Was RE: Esperanto
- From: "Donald E. Vick" <[email protected]>
- Subject: lu' vs. tu': Was RE: Esperanto
- Date: Fri, 16 Aug 1996 09:57:04 -0700 (PDT)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "Mark J. Reed" at Aug 16, 96 05:09:00 am
> Donald E. Vick wrote:
> > > HIja! Dochvam vIlu'ta'bogh . . . potlhqu'! tugh 'u' wIyaj!
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > What the heck is that?
jang marqoS:
> Well, for starters, it's the wrong prefix. Shold be {Dalu'ta'bogh}.
> > The stem seems to be <lu'>. Does lu' have another meaning?
> Nope, just the one: "find". "This thing which you have found . . ."
> -marqoS
jIyajtaHbe'. *Okay* 'oS <lu'>. chaq <tu'> DaHech.
> reH Suvrup tlhIngan SuvwI'.
latlh Dalo'nIS 'e' vIqel }}:-)
taDI'oS vIq, law'wI'pu'vaD Holtej jIH
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Thaddaeus A. Vick, Linguist to the Masses | mailto: [email protected] -or- |
| | [email protected] |
| gules, on a saltire argent voided azure, | |
| thirteen mullets of the second. Yeeha. | http://www.crl.com/~dvick |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------