tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Apr 15 18:26:54 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Interesting constuct...

• From: [email protected] (Alan Anderson)
• Subject: Re: Interesting constuct...
• Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1996 20:29:26 -0500

~mark writes:
>...Why not use -logh on pagh, anyway?

Looks good to me, but it gives me a strange idea.  Don't take this idea
too seriously, but if the usage of {Hoch} before a noun is acceptable,
perhaps we can try {*Hochlogh} to imply "every single time" (a slightly
different shade of meaning from {reH} "always").

-- ghunchu'wI'               batlh Suvchugh vaj batlh SovchoH vaj

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Interesting constuct...
    • From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Nitpicker (was Re: qaSovlu' jIneH & SPAM)
• Next by Date: perfective and "today"
• Prev by thread: Re: Interesting constuct...
• Next by thread: Re: Interesting constuct...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level