tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed May 31 10:41:37 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: new one = trigger
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: new one = trigger
- Date: Wed, 31 May 95 13:41:35 EDT
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>; from "Alan Anderson" at May 31, 95 9:47 am
According to Alan Anderson:
>
> ... ("Hoch" as a number, for instance)...
Lousey for instance. Until Okrand comes out and says otherwise,
{Hoch} is definitely NOT a number. That was a mistaken
suggestion by Glen Proechel, once again overgeneralizing,
somehow relating {pagh} which is explicitly listed as both a
number and as a noun with {Hoch} which is explicitly listed as
a noun only. It is not listed as a number. It is not listed as
such in TKD anywhere, or in any other canon source. It is not a
number. It is not a number.
Let me make this clear.
{Hoch} is not a number.
Please consider the mistaken rumor that it might be a number to
be simply a mistaken rumor and not even so much as an
interesting idea.
Okay?
charghwI'
--
\___
o_/ \
<\__,\
"> | Get a grip.
` |