tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed May 24 20:15:57 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: jImawqu'wI'
According to [email protected]:
>
> jabbI'IDDaq cha'vatlh wa'maH loS ja'ta' charghwI':
>
> > bInIDtaH.
> > manIDnIStaH Hoch.
>
> <'oH> <ghaH> je Da'a' <Hoch>?
Dochmey maHbe'ba'! nuvpu' maH. <'oH> <ghaH> joq DalaH <Hoch>
'ach jabbI'IDwIjDaq <ghaH> neH Daba' <Hoch>.
> <nIDnIStaH Hoch> pagh <manIDnIStaH maH Hoch> Dajatlh 'e' DaHech'a'?
Since the two sentences are acting as objects of the verb
{jatlh}, I would have expected them to be followed by {ghap}
rather than divided by {pagh}... Anyway,
choyajchu' 'e' vIHarqu'. lugh mu'tlheghwIj 'e' vIHar je. jaS
Harchugh latlh vaj yIjatlh!
> > potlhqu' naDHa'ghach.
> > ramqu' QaghlIj.
> > nInaDHa' neHchugh vay' vaj qaHub.
>
> <DunaDHa'neHchugh vay' vaj qaHub> DaHech 'e' vIHarqa'neS.
ghobe'. DunaDHa'laHbe' wa' nuv net Sov. DanaDHa'lu'chugh vaj
Qochbe'nIS tlhIngan law'. vaj <nInaDHa'> vIjatlhta'. jIQaghbe'.
> Brad
charghwI'
--
\___
o_/ \
<\__,\
"> | Get a grip.
` |