tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Mar 09 05:35:05 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: E pluribus unum: $0.02-wIj
Just to prove that I really read what you wrote:
According to R.B Franklin:
>
> nughoS jagh Dujmey yo'. Dujmaj lurghDaq cha baH Dajmeychaj Hoch.
Isn't that {Dujmeychaj}? Also, {Dujmey yo'} seems redundent.
None of this picked nits is intended to indicate that I am less
than pleased with your writing. maDubmeH maghItlhnIS Hoch.
> Do' Dujmaj mup wa' neH. law'wI'vo' 'oH wa''e'.
>
> > ~mark
>
> yoDtargh
charghwI'
--
\___
o_/ \
<\__,\
"> | Get a grip.
` |