tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Mar 07 14:30:09 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: TLHINGAN-HOL digest 129

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: TLHINGAN-HOL digest 129
• Date: Tue, 7 Mar 1995 17:28:53 -0500

>> wa' qum lumoj law'bogh qum(mey)

Since Stative Verbs such as law' may become Noun 2s, i.e. adjectives to us
Earthlings, I now suggest:

wa' qum lumoj qum(mey) law'
or
wa' qo' lumoj qo'(mey) law'

• Prev by Date: Re: nI'
• Next by Date: Re: nI'
• Prev by thread: Re: TLHINGAN-HOL digest 129
• Next by thread: BG: E pluribus unum (again)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level