tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jan 13 16:23:00 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: HolQeD 3.4. -wI'
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: HolQeD 3.4. -wI'
- Date: Fri, 13 Jan 95 17:59:09 EST
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>; from "David E G Sturm" at Jan 12, 95 9:15 am
According to David E G Sturm:
>
> > Using his own interpretation of {-wI'} meaning "one who is", I'd
> > call him {QIpwI'}.
>
> Completely irresponsible comment, and flame bait---except he has no net
> access, so it's kinda like using TV to call ascetic monks stupid. I'm
> not laughing here.
I agree. I was out of line. Apologies, given to the same lack
of access as the original, unnecessary insult. I was in a bad
mood. Life's been a little stressful lately. I'll try to regain
balance.
charghwI'
--
\___
o_/ \
<\__,\
"> | Get a grip.
` |