tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Dec 04 08:02:46 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: wamwI' yIn pem
>Date: Sat, 2 Dec 1995 13:04:08 -0800
>From: "R.B Franklin" <[email protected]>
>On Thu, 23 Nov 1995, Marc Ruehlaender wrote:
>nom jabbI'IDlIj vIjangbe'mo' jItlhIj.
>> Ha'DIbaH tu'lu'be'
>To me, this implies that there are no animals to be found (by anyone).
>(Which is maybe which you meant.)
>If there are animals there, but the hunter simply doesn't find them, I
>would say, {Ha'DIbaH tu'be'.}
FWIW, Okrand uses "tu'be'lu'" instead of "tu'lu'be'" usually. I think both
ways make sense. Also, for plural animals it technically should be
"lutu'be'lu'"
>~mark, did you ever forward our "wish list" to Okrand?
I didn't, Lawrence did.
~mark