tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Aug 14 11:44:38 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: }} roj vISovnIS
- From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: }} roj vISovnIS
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 1995 11:44:38 -0400
>From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
>Date: Mon, 14 Aug 1995 09:07:39 -0400 (EDT)
>According to [email protected]:
>> 'ach jIjatlh:
>>
>> roj Suvlu'chugh vaj roj Sovlu'be'
>I find it very strange to negate the indefinite subject.
Okrand has given us canon supporting that. We have several(?) examples of
"-lu'" and "-be'" combined to give "V-be'lu'" and not the other way
'round. The example I can think of is "QuvlIjDaq yIH tu'be'lu'jaj."
~mark