tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Aug 14 08:40:56 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: }} {-wI'} on sentences
- From: [email protected] (Soqra'tIS)
- Subject: Re: }} {-wI'} on sentences
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 1995 07:40:56 -0500
<...*whew*... Much SnIppeD...>
>I choose now to reject objects on a verb with {-ghach}. By association, I
>must reject objects on a verb with {-wI'). I must expand my interpretation
>of the noun-noun construction to encompass "energy changer" etc.
>
>charghwI', maybe I should get you a T-shirt that says:
>
> chargh
> I won the vs -wI' debate of 1995!
> ghunchu'
>
>I at least owe you a box of chocolate-covered tribbles.
>
> -- ghunchu'wI'
"And there was much rejoycing." (yea)
Gentlepersons, thanks for a very entertaining debate. I hope *I* have
learned something from this.
vay' yIHub Hoch 'ej Hoch tIHub vay' - DumaS
-------------------------------------------------
vIta'pu'be' !!! tlhIngan ghaH *Bart Simpson*'e'
Soqra'tIS [email protected]