tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Sep 25 14:33:06 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: DaH 'e' jImev
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: DaH 'e' jImev
- Date: Sun, 25 Sep 94 17:32:59 EDT
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>; from "Mark E. Shoulson" at Sep 25, 94 4:44 pm
According to Mark E. Shoulson:
>
>
> >From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
> >Date: Sun, 25 Sep 94 13:38:29 EDT
>
> >jIjatlh 'e' DaH vImev.
>
> Actually, as Krankor corrected me one of the first few times we spoke to
> each other, it works better as "jIjatlh DaH 'e' vImev". You can still do
> what you did, tho, according to 6.7 in the addendum.
>
> ~mark
Yep. It DOES make more sense with DaH before 'e'.
HIvqa' veqlargh!
charghwI'