tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jul 14 14:19:59 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: oops
Hu'tegh! nuq ja' [email protected] jay'?
Well, I've been cleaning up my backlog of email, as you'll know, and I came
up with this from late April.
(charghwI's transcript of ST:V)
=>Klaa: qIpmeH Qatlh'a' (Difficult to hit?)
Oh my god.
Does anybody remember the whole "naghmeH chechqu'" business?
And I've already changed all my texts, too. Just as well, I suppose. The
alternative (naghlaHbe' chechmo') is cleaner.
If anyone reckons qIpmeH Qatlh'a' doesn't support naghmeH chechqu', speak up!
Nick.