tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Feb 17 20:57:02 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
KLBC
- From: "Matthew Whiteacre" <[email protected]>
- Subject: KLBC
- Date: Fri, 18 Feb 94 08:55:55 CST
At the end there is a question for the grammerians.
ja'chugghach vImuv vIneH
tlhIngan HolDaq chorgh jar vIvumtaH
Doch law' vIghojnISbej
nughojmoHlaHlaw' *KLBC* 'e' vIQub
Here is the vocabulary output:
1 bej certainly (verb suffix), watch (v)
1 chorgh eight (num)
1 Daq eavesdrop(v); site(n); to, in, at, on (noun suffix)
1 Doch be rude (v), thing (n)
1 'e' emphasis on (type 5 noun), that (previous topic) (pro)
1 ghach nominalizer (make noun out of) (type 9 verb suffix)
1 ghoj learn (v)
1 ghojmoH teach, instruct (v)
1 Hol language (n)
1 ja'chuq discuss, confer (v); succession ritual (ancient) (n)
1 jar month (Klingon) (n)
1 laH ability (n); can, able (verb suffix)
2 law' be many (v); apparently (verb suffix)
1 muv join (v)
1 neH only, just (adv); want (v)
1 nIS disrupt, interfere (v); need (verb suffix)
1 nu (he/she, they | us)
1 Qub think (v)
1 taH continue, endure (v); continuous (verb suffix)
1 tlhIngan Klingon (n)
5 vI (I | him/her, them)
1 vum work, toil (v)
To the Grammerians:
Was the use a ghach on ja'chuq correct, assuming that you do not use ghach
on bare stem verbs? The TKD lists ja'chuq as a verb, however it is
certainly ja' with the suffix chuq.
____
|INRI|
____| |____
| |
|____ ____|
| | Matt Whiteacre
| | [email protected]
| |
| |
|____|