tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Feb 01 02:33:04 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
tInwI'bID Ha'DIbaH qu' je
- From: [email protected] (Mark E. Shoulson)
- Subject: tInwI'bID Ha'DIbaH qu' je
- Date: Tue, 1 Feb 1994 14:19:49 -0500
- In-Reply-To: Nick NICHOLAS's message of Sun, 30 Jan 94 23:55:55 EDT <[email protected]>
>From: [email protected] (Nick NICHOLAS)
>Date: Sun, 30 Jan 94 23:55:55 EDT
>batlh choja', Mark E. Shoulson quv:
>=>=Ha'DIbaHvam pujlaw' qar'a' tlhob'egh
>=>pujlaw' qar'a' Ha'DIbaHvam
>=No, {pujlaw' Ha'DIbaHvam qar'a'}. See page 179. The tag sentence "qar'a'"
>=follows the previous sentence, it doesn't intervene inside it.
>Um, Mark, I *am* looking at page 179. At the example "De' Sov qar'a' HoD".
>"qar'a'" can follow the verb. qayajHa''a'?
Hmm, so it does. I must have missed that even when I looked it up to
double-check. I guess I'm so used to hearing it the other way.
>=or better, avoid the "-ghach" with "-mo'". Something like "bIlay'pu'mo'
>=yIta'" (or replace "ta'" with an appropriate verb). Think like charghwI'.
>Well, yes, you *could* do that, I suppose... ;)
There are worse methods... :)
~mark