tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Dec 10 10:31:52 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: Adverbials
[For once, a posting of mine might actually make sense!]
> William H. Martin writes:
> >
> > According to R. B. Franklin:
> >>
> >> Have you seen any canon examples that indicate whether you can negate
> >> adverbials?
> >>
> >> Could you say:
> >>
> >> ghaytanbe' (unlikely)
> >> jaSbe' (similarly)
> >> pe'vIlHa' (gently)
> >>
> >>
> >> yoDtargh
> >
> > While it would be enormously useful, no, there is no canon and
> > no grammatical justification for doing this.
>
> What about {Do'} and {Do'Ha'}? (the latter is on p. 171 in TKD).
I think the -Ha' is being added to the VERB Do' (=be fortunate, lucky).
> P.S. Really nice summary of grammar, charghwI', in your last post.
jIQochbe'.
> P.P.S. I'm adopting a *nom de Hol* for the list; from now on just call me
> {ter'eS}
>
> > charghwI'
>
> ter'eS
>
>
> ===============================================
> : Terry Donnelly : bIvangtaHvIS :
> : Maplewood Pub. Lib. : yIyoHvIpQo' 'ej :
> : 7601 Manchester Ave. : yIDoHQo' - :
> : St. Louis, MO 63143 : Hoch yIn 'oH ngong'e':
> : (314) 781-2174 : R. W. Emerson :
> :---------------------------------------------:
> : [email protected] :
> ===============================================
>
- toDbaj
-----------------------------------------------------------
| $$$$$ ,$$$$$ ,$$$$$ $ |
| $$$$ ,$$ $ ,$$$$$ ,$$ $ |
| $$$$ $$ $$$$$ $$$ $$ $$ $$ |
| $$$$ ,$$ $ $$ ,$$ ,$$ $ |
| $$$$ $$$$$ $$ $$$ $$$$$ $ |
| $$$ ,$$$ $$ ,$$ ,$$$ |
| $$$ $$$$$$$$$ $$ $$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$$ |
| $$$ $$$ $$ $$ $$$ |
-----------------------------------------------------------
(does this look right?)