tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Dec 01 12:42:43 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: paghna'
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: paghna'
- Date: Thu, 1 Dec 94 15:42:35 EST
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>; from "...Paul" at Nov 30, 94 6:42 pm
According to ...Paul:
>
> jabbI'ID Daj vIghItlh vIneHpu' 'ach vIjatlh vIneHbogh vay' vIchenmoHlaHbe'
> vaj jabbI'IDvam vIngevta'
not vay' chenmoHlaHbogh vay''e' vISov. chaq vay' DatlhejlaHbogh
Datu'laH. vay' DachennISbe'moH. qoq DachenmoH DaneH'a'?
jatlhlaHchu'be' qoqpu' law'.
> mu'tlheghmey vIghItlhta'bogh yIlughmoH jImujchugh.
As a point of style, this kind of sentence is a little easier
to read if you put the conditional first. While you can arrange
things differently, subjects, objects and dependent verbs are
easier to sort out if the main verb is the last verb. This is
only my opinion.
majQa'.
> Satlho'
>
> ..Paul
>
>
charghwI'
--
\___
o_/ \
<\__,\
"> | Get a grip.
` |